29 CFR 1910.119: Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals
The official text is on the eCFR. This page maps how the section is organized, quotes the paragraphs our ASP, CSP practice questions are built on, and gives free questions you can try. Text below is quoted from the eCFR, current as of 2026-10-14; the section was last amended 2023-01-13.
How 29 CFR 1910.119 is organized
- (a) Application9 paragraphs
- (b) Definitions11 paragraphs
- (c) Employee participation3 paragraphs
- (d) Process safety information28 paragraphs
- (e) Process hazard analysis26 paragraphs
- (f) Operating procedures22 paragraphs
- (g) Training—(1) Initial training4 paragraphs
- (h) Contractors—(1) Application12 paragraphs
- (i) Pre-startup safety review6 paragraphs
- (j) Mechanical integrity—(1) Application17 paragraphs
- (k) Hot work permit2 paragraphs
- (l) Management of change10 paragraphs
- (m) Incident investigation12 paragraphs
- (n) Emergency planning and response1 paragraph
- (o) Compliance Audits5 paragraphs
- (p) Trade secrets3 paragraphs
- [Appendix A to § 1910.119]142 paragraphs
- [Appendix C to § 1910.119]65 paragraphs
- [Appendix D to § 1910.119]19 paragraphs
Paragraphs our practice questions cite most
Counted across the 43 live PassCited questions built on this section. This reflects our question bank, not the real exam.
“(4) The process hazard analysis shall be performed by a team with expertise in engineering and process operations, and the team shall include at least one employee who has experience and knowledge specific to the process being evaluated. Also, one member of the team must be knowledgeable in the specific process hazard analysis methodology being used.”
“(5) The employer shall establish a system to promptly address the team's findings and recommendations; assure that the recommendations are resolved in a timely manner and that the resolution is documented; document what actions are to be taken; complete actions as soon as possible; develop a written schedule of when these actions are to be completed; communicate the actions to operating, maintenance and other employees whose work assignments are in the process and who may be affected by the recommendations or actions.”
“(3) An incident investigation team shall be established and consist of at least one person knowledgeable in the process involved, including a contract employee if the incident involved work of the contractor, and other persons with appropriate knowledge and experience to thoroughly investigate and analyze the incident.”
“(m) Incident investigation. (1) The employer shall investigate each incident which resulted in, or could reasonably have resulted in a catastrophic release of highly hazardous chemical in the workplace.”
“(b) Definitions. Atmospheric tank means a storage tank which has been designed to operate at pressures from atmospheric through 0.5 p.s.i.g. (pounds per square inch gauge, 3.45 Kpa).”
Free practice questions on 29 CFR 1910.119
Question 1
A PHA team issues several recommendations for a covered process. The plant manager wants to handle them informally: verbal agreements with supervisors, no written record, to avoid paperwork. Which part of the standard does this approach violate?
Show answer and source
Answer: B. The requirement that recommendations be resolved in a timely manner and that the resolution be documented
The standard requires a system to assure recommendations are resolved timely and the resolution documented, along with documenting actions and a written completion schedule. It does not require every recommendation be implemented verbatim, agency approval, or limit tracking to catastrophic items.
Answer B rests on
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(5)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)“The employer shall establish a system to promptly address the team's findings and recommendations; assure that the recommendations are resolved in a timely manner and that the resolution is documented; document what actions are to be taken; complete actions as soon as possible; develop a written schedule of when these actions are to be completed; communicate the actions to operating, maintenance and other employees whose work assignments are in the process and who may be affected by the recommendations or actions.”
Question 2
A refinery's contractor crew is replacing valves in a process area. The contractor's safety coordinator reviews the training files and finds that each file has a sign-in sheet showing the worker's name and the date of the pre-job safety briefing. None of the files shows how the contractor confirmed that workers understood the briefing. The refinery's process safety manager says the sign-in sheets are enough because the refinery will keep its own contractor injury and illness log. What is the most accurate assessment under the PSM standard?
Show answer and source
Answer: A. The files are deficient, because the contractor employer must document the means used to verify understanding in addition to worker identity and training date
The standard puts the documentation duty on the contract employer. The record must include the employee's identity, the date of training, and the means used to verify understanding, so the files lacking verification are deficient. The host employer's injury and illness log is a separate obligation and does not replace this record.
Answer A rests on
29 CFR 1910.119(h)(3)(iii)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)“The contract employer shall document that each contract employee has received and understood the training required by this paragraph. The contract employer shall prepare a record which contains the identity of the contract employee, the date of training, and the means used to verify that the employee understood the training.”
Question 3
A plant is revalidating the process hazard analysis (PHA) for its existing covered process. The team assembled consists of a chemical engineer, a mechanical engineer, a corporate operations manager from another site who has deep process-operations expertise, and a trained facilitator who is an expert in the HAZOP method being used. No one on the team has ever worked in or on this particular process. What must the PSM coordinator do to make the revalidation team compliant?
Show answer and source
Answer: C. Add at least one employee who has experience and knowledge specific to the process being evaluated
The team already has engineering expertise, process-operations expertise, and a member who knows the methodology. It lacks an employee with experience and knowledge specific to this process, which the standard requires. The revalidation must be done by a team meeting the same requirements, so the idea that composition applies only to the initial PHA is wrong.
Answer C rests on
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(4)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)“The process hazard analysis shall be performed by a team with expertise in engineering and process operations, and the team shall include at least one employee who has experience and knowledge specific to the process being evaluated. Also, one member of the team must be knowledgeable in the specific process hazard analysis methodology being used.”
Question 4
A chemical plant certified its operating procedures for a covered process as current and accurate eight months ago. Last month the plant replaced a feed pump with a different design and began using a new process chemical. The supervisor proposes leaving the procedures as they are until the next annual certification in four months, since they were certified within the past year. What does the standard require?
Show answer and source
Answer: C. Review the procedures now and revise them to reflect the new equipment and chemical, because the review must keep pace with changes and is not tied to the annual certification date
The standard requires procedures to be reviewed as often as necessary so they reflect current practice, including changes in chemicals and equipment. The annual certification is a separate minimum check, so a recent certification does not excuse leaving outdated procedures in place after a change.
Answer C rests on
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(3)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)“The operating procedures shall be reviewed as often as necessary to assure that they reflect current operating practice, including changes that result from changes in process chemicals, technology, and equipment, and changes to facilities. The employer shall certify annually that these operating procedures are current and accurate.”
Question 5
A plant stores a highly hazardous chemical in three tanks. Tanks 1 and 2 sit side by side in a shared containment dike with no piping between them. The plant's own release analysis shows that a rupture of either one would put the chemical in the other at risk. Tank 3 holds the same chemical at the far end of the site, in a separate area where a release could not involve the other two tanks. How should the employer define the process(es) for applying the PSM standard?
Show answer and source
Answer: B. Tanks 1 and 2 are one process and Tank 3 is a separate process, because Tanks 1 and 2 are located so the chemical could be involved in a potential release
The standard groups interconnected vessels, and also separate vessels located so that a highly hazardous chemical could be involved in a potential release, into a single process. Tanks 1 and 2 meet that test even without piping, while Tank 3 does not. Lack of piping is therefore not what decides the grouping, and holding the same chemical alone does not make Tank 3 part of the process.
Answer B rests on
29 CFR 1910.119(b)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)“For purposes of this definition, any group of vessels which are interconnected and separate vessels which are located such that a highly hazardous chemical could be involved in a potential release shall be considered a single process.”
Where it shows up in exam prep
Find out which regulations you'd miss
Other Part 1910 sections
This is a study aid, not legal advice or an official interpretation. Always check the current eCFR text. Original practice questions, not real exam items. PassCited is not affiliated with or endorsed by BCSP.