29 CFR 1926.65: Hazardous waste operations and emergency response
The official text is on the eCFR. This page maps how the section is organized, quotes the paragraphs our CHST practice questions are built on, and gives free questions you can try. Text below is quoted from the eCFR, current as of 2026-10-14; the section was last amended 2020-11-16.
How 29 CFR 1926.65 is organized
- (a) Scope, application, and definitions—(1) Scope39 paragraphs
- (b)42 paragraphs
- (c) Site characterization and analysis—(1) General25 paragraphs
- (d)4 paragraphs
- (e)21 paragraphs
- (f)39 paragraphs
- (g)28 paragraphs
- (h) Monitoring—(1) General10 paragraphs
- (i) Informational programs1 paragraph
- (j) Handling drums and containers—(1) General40 paragraphs
- (k) Decontamination—(1) General12 paragraphs
- (l)23 paragraphs
- (m) Illumination9 paragraphs
- (n) Sanitation at temporary workplaces—(1) Potable water28 paragraphs
- (o) New technology programs2 paragraphs
- (p)37 paragraphs
- (q) Emerqency response to hazardous substance releases80 paragraphs
- [Appendix A to § 1926.65]100 paragraphs
- [Appendix B to § 1926.65]79 paragraphs
- [Appendix C to § 1926.65]42 paragraphs
- [Appendix D to § 1926.65]25 paragraphs
- [Appendix E to § 1926.65]293 paragraphs
Paragraphs our practice questions cite most
Counted across the 45 live PassCited questions built on this section. This reflects our question bank, not the real exam.
“(v) The site emergency response plan shall be reviewed periodically and, as necessary, be amended to keep it current with new or changing site conditions or information.”
“(8) Refresher training. Employees specified in paragraph (e)(1) of this section, and managers and supervisors specified in paragraph (e)(4) of this section, shall receive eight hours of refresher training annually on the items specified in paragraph (e)(2) and/or (e)(4) of this section, any critique of incidents that have occurred in the past year that can serve as training examples of related work, and other relevant topics.”
“(9) Equivalent training. Employers who can show by documentation or certification that an employee's work experience and/or training has resulted in training equivalent to that training required in paragraphs (e)(1) through (e)(4) of this section shall not be required to provide the initial training requirements of those paragraphs to such employees and shall provide a copy of the certification or documentation to the employee upon request. However, certified employees or employees with equivalent training new to a site shall receive appropriate, site specific training before site entry and ha…”
“(iv) Workers with 24 hours of training who are covered by paragraphs (e)(3)(ii) and (e)(3)(iii) of this section, and who become general site workers or who are required to wear respirators, shall have the additional 16 hours and two days of training necessary to total the training specified in paragraph (e)(3)(i).”
“(7) Emergency response. Employees who are engaged in responding to hazardous emergency situations at hazardous waste clean-up sites that may expose them to hazardous substances shall be trained in how to respond to such expected emergencies.”
Free practice questions on 29 CFR 1926.65
Question 1
During excavation on a construction site, a backhoe ruptures a drum buried in fill, and a liquid of unknown composition begins to seep across the ground toward a storm drain. The employer's emergency response plan assigns a first responder at the operations level to the initial response. The responder has the training and PPE for that role only. Which action fits that role?
Show answer and source
Answer: A. Contain the seepage from a safe distance, keep it from spreading toward the drain, and prevent exposures
Operations-level responders work defensively: they contain the release from a safe distance, keep it from spreading, and prevent exposures. Plugging or patching at the point of release, and identifying unknowns with field instruments, are hazardous materials technician functions.
Answer A rests on
29 CFR 1926.65(q)(6)(ii)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)“They are trained to respond in a defensive fashion without actually trying to stop the release. Their function is to contain the release from a safe distance, keep it from spreading, and prevent exposures.”
Question 2
A contractor excavating for a utility trench has a written plan stating that if an unknown drum ruptures and releases a hazardous substance, all crew members will immediately evacuate to a designated assembly point and call the fire department. No employee is permitted to assist in handling the release. The contractor has also prepared an emergency action plan under 1926.35. Which statement best describes the contractor's obligation regarding a full emergency response plan under the HAZWOPER emergency response paragraph?
Show answer and source
Answer: A. The contractor is exempt from the emergency response plan requirement because employees will evacuate and not assist, and an emergency action plan is provided
The standard exempts employers who evacuate employees from the danger area, do not allow any employee to assist in handling the emergency, and provide an emergency action plan under 1926.35. The contractor's facts meet all those conditions. A full plan is not required, and nothing requires fire department co-signature.
Answer A rests on
29 CFR 1926.65(q)(1)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)“Employers who will evacuate their employees from the danger area when an emergency occurs, and who do not permit any of their employees to assist in handling the emergency, are exempt from the requirements of this paragraph if they provide an emergency action plan in accordance with § 1926.35 of this part.”
Question 3
A contractor excavating for a utility trench has a written plan stating that, if an unknown drum is punctured and leaks, all workers will immediately leave the area and go to a designated assembly point. No employee is permitted to help control the release; outside responders will be called. The contractor has also prepared an emergency action plan under § 1926.35. Does the contractor still need a full written emergency response plan under the HAZWOPER emergency response paragraph?
Show answer and source
Answer: C. No, because employers who evacuate employees and permit none to assist in handling the emergency are exempt if they provide an emergency action plan under § 1926.35.
The standard exempts employers who evacuate employees from the danger area and do not let any employee assist in handling the emergency, provided they have an emergency action plan under § 1926.35. A full plan is therefore not required here. Fire department approval is not a condition of the exemption.
Answer C rests on
29 CFR 1926.65(q)(1)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)“Employers who will evacuate their employees from the danger area when an emergency occurs, and who do not permit any of their employees to assist in handling the emergency, are exempt from the requirements of this paragraph if they provide an emergency action plan in accordance with § 1926.35 of this part.”
Question 4
A remediation contractor hires an experienced hazardous waste worker who holds a certificate from a prior employer showing training equivalent to the initial HAZWOPER training. The worker is new to the contractor's clean-up site and is scheduled to enter the exclusion zone on his first morning. The site manager believes the certificate alone is enough, so no further site training is needed. Which action is required?
Show answer and source
Answer: C. Give the worker appropriate site-specific training before site entry and supervised field experience at the new site
Equivalent training excuses the employer from the initial training, but a certified worker new to a site still needs appropriate site-specific training before entry and supervised field experience there. The certificate does not waive everything, and the employer need not repeat the full initial course.
Answer C rests on
29 CFR 1926.65(e)(9)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)“However, certified employees or employees with equivalent training new to a site shall receive appropriate, site specific training before site entry and have appropriate supervised field experience at the new site.”
Question 5
A contractor is starting cleanup of a site contaminated with hazardous substances. A new general laborer will be removing contaminated soil. The site supervisor proposes sending the laborer to work immediately alongside experienced workers and arranging classroom training "sometime during the first month." Based on the HAZWOPER training rule, what is the correct response?
Show answer and source
Answer: C. Not acceptable, because employees may not take part in field activities until trained to the level their job function requires.
The standard bars employees from participating in or supervising field activities until they are trained to the level their job requires. Delayed training and on-the-job pairing do not meet this requirement, and general laborers are explicitly covered.
Answer C rests on
29 CFR 1926.65(e)(1)(ii)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)“(ii) Employees shall not be permitted to participate in or supervise field activities until they have been trained to a level required by their job function and responsibility.”
Where it shows up in exam prep
Find out which regulations you'd miss
Other Part 1926 sections
This is a study aid, not legal advice or an official interpretation. Always check the current eCFR text. Original practice questions, not real exam items. PassCited is not affiliated with or endorsed by BCSP.