Skip to content

Free BCSP CSP practice test

14 free sample questions for the BCSP Certified Safety Professional (CSP) exam, drawn from every domain of BCSP's CSP11 Examination Blueprint, V.2024.04.24. Each answer is explained and cites the OSHA rule, standard or formula source it tests. No sign-up needed.

The CSP exam in brief

  • Run by the Board of Certified Safety Professionals (BCSP), computer-based, multiple choice.
  • Time allowed: 5.5 hours (BCSP Credentials At-A-Glance).
  • 7 domains: Advanced Application of Safety Principles 25%; Program Management 25%; Risk Management 15%; Emergency Management 9%; Environmental Management 6%; Occupational Health and Applied Science 10%; Training 10%.

These are practice questions written by PassCited, not real exam questions. PassCited is not affiliated with BCSP.

Domain 1: Advanced Application of Safety Principles

Question 1

A maintenance crew is evaluating a mobile ladder stand with locking casters. The stand's tallest work surface is 12 feet above the floor and its shortest base dimension is 2.5 feet. No outriggers or counterweights are fitted. Which action does the standard require before employees use it at that height?

Show answer and source: 29 CFR 1910.23(e)(1)(vi)

Answer: B. Add outriggers, counterweights, or comparable means to prevent overturning, because the height exceeds four times the shortest base dimension

OSHA's general industry rule, 29 CFR 1910.23(e)(1)(vi), limits a mobile ladder stand's work-surface height to four times its shortest base dimension without added support: 4 × 2.5 ft = 10 ft. At 12 ft, outriggers, counterweights, or comparable means are required. The rule sets no six-times limit and no 10-foot cap for wheeled stands. Locked casters stop rolling, not overturning.

On the job

A facilities supervisor at a manufacturing plant prepares a mobile work platform for light overhead repairs. The platform's work surface is 9 feet above the floor and its shortest base dimension is 2 feet, with no added stabilizers. The supervisor compares the height to four times the shortest base dimension, 8 feet, and sees it is exceeded. Before anyone climbs it, outriggers, counterweights, or comparable means are installed to prevent overturning.

Study aid, not site-specific safety advice. The official rule controls.

Answer B comes from

29 CFR 1910.23(e)(1)(vi)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)
“The maximum work-surface height of mobile ladder stands and platforms does not exceed four times the shortest base dimension, without additional support. For greater heights, outriggers, counterweights, or comparable means that stabilize the mobile ladder stands and platforms and prevent overturning must be used;”

Domain 1: Advanced Application of Safety Principles

Question 2

A carrier wants to hire a driver without giving a new pre-employment controlled substances test. The driver was in a Part 40-conforming DOT testing program within the last 30 days and was tested through it four months before applying. While reviewing her history, the carrier learns that a previous employer it knows about holds a record of her controlled substances violation from three months ago. Her current program has provided verification of her participation. May the carrier rely on the exception to skip the pre-employment test?

Show answer and source: 49 CFR 382.301(b)(3)

Answer: D. No, because the exception requires the carrier to ensure that no known prior employer has a violation record from the previous six months, and one does

The federal motor carrier drug testing rule, 49 CFR 382.301(b)(3), lets a carrier skip the pre-employment test only if it ensures no known prior employer holds a controlled substances violation record from the previous six months. A known three-month-old record defeats the exception. Recent testing, Part 40 conformance, program verification, or a clean report from only the latest employer cannot cure it.

On the job

A fleet safety manager at a regional hauling company wants to skip a pre-employment drug test for an experienced hire who recently tested in a compliant program. A phone check shows one known former employer holds a record of a controlled substances violation from within the previous six months. The manager gives the test anyway, since the exception requires ensuring no known prior employer has such a record.

Study aid, not site-specific safety advice. The official rule controls.

Answer D comes from

49 CFR 382.301(b)(3)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)
“(3) The employer ensures that no prior employer of the driver of whom the employer has knowledge has records of a violation of this part or the controlled substances use rule of another DOT agency within the previous six months.”

Domain 2: Program Management

Question 3

A psychiatric hospital's safety manager is reviewing its recordkeeping after a patient assault. A nurse was punched by a patient and was admitted to the hospital as an inpatient that same afternoon for a fractured orbital bone. The facility's supervisor assumed the event only needed to go on the OSHA 300 Log at the next routine entry. Which action is consistent with the guidance?

Show answer and source: OSHA 3148, Guidelines for Preventing Workplace Violence for Healthcare and Social Service Workers (2016), PDF p. 34

Answer: A. Report the inpatient hospitalization to OSHA within 24 hours, because all work-related inpatient hospitalizations must be reported within that time, and enter the injury on the log if it meets the recording criteria

OSHA's reporting rule, effective January 2015 and summarized in OSHA 3148, requires employers to report every work-related inpatient hospitalization within 24 hours. Assault injuries also go on the OSHA 300 Log if they meet the recording criteria. Assaults are not exempt from reporting, the 24-hour deadline is not limited to amputations and eye losses, and the 8-hour deadline applies only to fatalities.

On the job

At a group home for adults with disabilities, a program director learns a caregiver was kicked by a resident and admitted to a hospital that evening for a fractured wrist. The director does not wait for the monthly paperwork review. Because it is a work-related inpatient hospitalization, the report to OSHA goes out within 24 hours, and the injury is evaluated for entry on the OSHA 300 Log.

Study aid, not site-specific safety advice. The official rule controls.

Answer A comes from

OSHA 3148, Guidelines for Preventing Workplace Violence for Healthcare and Social Service Workers (2016), PDF p. 34(opens osha.gov in a new tab)
“As of January 2015, all employers must report: (1) all work-related fatalities within 8 hours and (2) all work-related inpatient hospitalizations, all amputations and all losses of an eye within 24 hours. Injuries caused by assaults must be entered on the log if they meet the recording criteria.”

Domain 2: Program Management

Question 4

A plant is planning four jobs on a covered process. Which one is not a "replacement in kind" and so needs the written management of change procedure first?

Show answer and source: 29 CFR 1910.119(l)(1)

Answer: C. Swapping a pump for a larger model with a higher flow rating

The key word is "replacement in kind" because only a like-for-like swap is exempt from management of change; a part with different capacity is a change to equipment. A larger pump with a higher flow rating alters the process design, so the written procedure must address its technical basis and safety impact before the work. The runner-up, replacing the relief valve, is tempting because relief valves are safety-critical, but the same model and set pressure make it a replacement in kind. The identical seal and the same-alloy elbow are also like-for-like swaps, so they are exempt.

Answer C comes from

29 CFR 1910.119(l)(1)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)
“The employer shall establish and implement written procedures to manage changes (except for “replacements in kind”) to process chemicals, technology, equipment, and procedures; and, changes to facilities that affect a covered process.”

Domain 3: Risk Management

Question 5

A fabrication shop's air monitoring shows that, even with a well-maintained local exhaust ventilation system and wet-cutting methods in place, employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica remains above the PEL. The employer has confirmed that no additional feasible engineering or work practice controls are available. What does the silica standard require the employer to do?

Show answer and source: 29 CFR 1910.1053(f)(1)

Answer: B. Keep using the feasible engineering and work practice controls to reach the lowest feasible exposure level and supplement them with compliant respiratory protection

The silica standard, 29 CFR 1910.1053(f)(1), says that when feasible engineering and work practice controls cannot reach the permissible exposure limit (PEL), the employer shall nonetheless use them to reach the lowest feasible exposure and supplement them with respiratory protection meeting paragraph (g). Dropping existing controls, whether for respirators alone or for job rotation, conflicts with this. Administrative controls alone do not satisfy it.

On the job

An EHS manager at a ceramic tile plant finds that respirable crystalline silica at the glaze-mixing station stays above the PEL even though exhaust ventilation and wet methods are working properly and no further feasible controls exist. The manager does not strip out the controls. They stay in service to hold exposure at the lowest feasible level, and respirators meeting paragraph (g) are added as a supplement.

Study aid, not site-specific safety advice. The official rule controls.

Answer B comes from

29 CFR 1910.1053(f)(1)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)
“Wherever such feasible engineering and work practice controls are not sufficient to reduce employee exposure to or below the PEL, the employer shall nonetheless use them to reduce employee exposure to the lowest feasible level and shall supplement them with the use of respiratory protection that complies with the requirements of paragraph (g) of this section.”

Domain 3: Risk Management

Question 6

A chemical plant runs a complex continuous process with many interconnected lines and control loops. The PHA team will divide it into nodes and apply guide words such as "more," "less," and "no" to find deviations from design intent. Which method fits best?

Show answer and source: 29 CFR 1910.119(e)(1)

Answer: B. HAZOP, applied node by node to the lines and controls

The key word is "guide words" applied to "deviations from design intent," because that is the defining technique of a HAZOP, which suits a complex process with many lines and controls. HAZOP walks each node and asks what happens if flow, pressure, or temperature goes more, less, or no. The runner-up, FMEA, is wrong because it starts from how each component can fail rather than from process deviations, so it does not use guide words. A checklist compares the process to known items and would miss unusual deviations in a complex system. Fault Tree Analysis works backward from one chosen event, so it does not screen every node.

Answer B comes from

29 CFR 1910.119(e)(1)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)
“The process hazard analysis shall be appropriate to the complexity of the process and shall identify, evaluate, and control the hazards involved in the process.”

Domain 4: Emergency Management

Question 7

A distribution center employee decants corrosive liquids into packages and prepares them for shipment. So far, the employee has completed a course on recognizing and identifying hazardous materials from labels, markings and shipping papers, and a session on the packaging and marking requirements for the exact packages he prepares. The employer has installed local exhaust ventilation at the decanting station and requires splash goggles, gloves and a specific eyewash procedure. Which required training element has NOT yet been provided?

Show answer and source: 49 CFR 172.704(a)(3)(ii)

Answer: B. Safety training on protecting the employee from the hazards he may be exposed to at work, including the employer's specific exposure-protection measures

DOT's hazmat training rule, 49 CFR 172.704(a)(3)(ii), requires safety training on protecting employees from workplace hazmat hazards, including the employer's own measures: here the exhaust ventilation, goggles, gloves and eyewash procedure. Awareness training on recognizing hazmat and function-specific packaging and marking training were already completed, and training on functions he does not perform does not supply this.

On the job

An EHS manager at a chemical repackaging facility audits training records for a worker who fills drums and prepares them for shipment. The worker has general awareness and function-specific training, but nothing on protecting himself from the hazards he is exposed to on the job. The manager schedules safety training covering the plant's own exposure measures, such as the fume hood, face shield, apron and spill kit procedure.

Study aid, not site-specific safety advice. The official rule controls.

Answer B comes from

49 CFR 172.704(a)(3)(ii)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)
“(ii) Measures to protect the employee from the hazards associated with hazardous materials to which they may be exposed in the work place, including specific measures the hazmat employer has implemented to protect employees from exposure; and”

Domain 4: Emergency Management

Question 8

After a plant's full-scale chemical release exercise, evaluators merged the incident commander's logs, radio recordings, and observer notes into a single timeline. It shows that the shift supervisor did not sound the shelter-in-place alarm until 14 minutes after the emergency plan required it. The timeline records who, what, when, where, and how, but it says nothing about the reason for the delay. The EHS manager wants to find the most basic cause of the missed action so that improvement efforts address the underlying problem rather than just retraining the supervisor. Which analysis technique should the evaluators use next?

Show answer and source: FEMA, Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) Doctrine (2020), PDF p. 62

Answer: C. Root cause analysis

FEMA's Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) Doctrine defines root cause analysis as identifying the most basic causal factor for why an expected action was not performed as expected. Adding log sources or synthesizing data only organizes more facts about what happened. Trend analysis looks for patterns across exercises over time, not the cause of one delay.

On the job

After a refinery's fire-response drill, evaluators build a timeline showing a foam-system activation lagged well behind the plan. The timeline shows what happened but not why. The EHS manager directs the team to apply root cause analysis to find the most basic causal factor, so the corrective action addresses that underlying cause instead of simply retraining the operator on duty.

Study aid, not site-specific safety advice. The official rule controls.

Answer C comes from

FEMA, Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) Doctrine (2020), PDF p. 62(opens fema.gov in a new tab)
“Root cause analysis focuses on identifying the most basic causal factor for why an expected action did not occur or was not performed as expected. Determining the underlying reason behind an identified issue allows the evaluator to direct improvement.”

Domain 5: Environmental Management

Question 9

A manufacturing plant stores hydraulic oil and lube oil in 55-gallon drums and totes that are moved in and out of storage areas every week, so the exact number of containers changes often. The plant has not submitted a facility response plan. The SPCC Plan author asks how to describe these mobile containers. Which approach meets the Plan content rule?

Show answer and source: 40 CFR 112.7(a)(3)(i)

Answer: D. Give the type of oil and capacity for each container, or estimate the number of mobile containers, the oil types, and the expected capacities

The SPCC rule requires the Plan to give the type of oil and capacity for fixed containers. For mobile or portable containers, it allows either per-container details or an estimate of the number, oil types, and anticipated capacities. Leaving them out, assuming all match the largest drum, or counting employees does not meet this.

On the job

A safety coordinator at a distribution center is writing the SPCC Plan section covering forklift fluid and lubricant drums that arrive and leave on delivery trucks, so the drum count never stays the same. Listing every drum is impractical, so the coordinator records an estimate of how many mobile containers are likely on site, the types of oil, and the anticipated storage capacities. The rule allows that in place of per-container entries.

Study aid, not site-specific safety advice. The official rule controls.

Answer D comes from

40 CFR 112.7(a)(3)(i)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)
“For mobile or portable containers, either provide the type of oil and storage capacity for each container or provide an estimate of the potential number of mobile or portable containers, the types of oil, and anticipated storage capacities;”

Domain 5: Environmental Management

Question 10

A small quantity generator's waste accumulation area has a direct alarm that connects to the local fire department. The site must post emergency information next to the telephones in that area. Which choice correctly states the minimum information the posting must contain, and why?

Show answer and source: 40 CFR 262.16(b)(9)(ii)(C)

Answer: D. The coordinator's name and number and the locations of extinguishers, spill control material and the fire alarm; no fire department number

The small quantity generator emergency procedures require posting the coordinator's name and number and the locations of extinguishers, spill control material and any fire alarm. The fire department's number is required only if the facility lacks a direct alarm. The other choices wrongly require that number or drop the coordinator and equipment information.

On the job

A foreman at an electronics assembly plant is reposting emergency information near the telephone in the waste accumulation area after a layout change. The area has a direct alarm to the fire department. The new sign lists the emergency coordinator's name and number plus the locations of the fire extinguishers, spill control material, and fire alarm. The foreman leaves off the fire department's telephone number, because that number is required only when no direct alarm exists.

Study aid, not site-specific safety advice. The official rule controls.

Answer D comes from

40 CFR 262.16(b)(9)(ii)(C)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)
“(C) The telephone number of the fire department, unless the facility has a direct alarm.”

Domain 6: Occupational Health and Applied Science

Question 11

An audiologist reviews a worker's annual audiogram against the baseline. The worker's left ear shows changes of 5, 10, and 15 dB at 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz, respectively. The right ear shows no change. Using the standard's definition, how should the result be classified?

Show answer and source: 29 CFR 1910.95(g)(10)(i)

Answer: C. Standard threshold shift, because the average change at 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz in the left ear is 10 dB

OSHA's noise standard, 29 CFR 1910.95(g)(10)(i), defines a standard threshold shift as an average change of 10 dB or more at 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz in either ear. Left ear: (5 + 10 + 15) / 3 = 10 dB, so it qualifies. One ear is enough. The average counts, not each frequency. 6000 Hz is not part of the definition.

On the job

An occupational health nurse at a sawmill compares a planer operator's annual audiogram with baseline. The left ear is unchanged, and the right ear shows shifts of 10, 15, and 20 dB at 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz. She averages those three frequencies, gets 15 dB, and classifies it as a standard threshold shift. The unchanged left ear does not matter, since a shift in either ear meets the definition.

Study aid, not site-specific safety advice. The official rule controls.

Answer C comes from

29 CFR 1910.95(g)(10)(i)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)
“As used in this section, a standard threshold shift is a change in hearing threshold relative to the baseline audiogram of an average of 10 dB or more at 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz in either ear.”

Domain 6: Occupational Health and Applied Science

Question 12

A hearing conservation contractor's client, a metal stamping plant, is closing its business and a different company is taking over the site and workforce. The plant's files include noise exposure measurement records from 14 months ago and audiometric test records for several employees who will continue working at the site under the new owner. The outgoing safety manager asks what must be done with these records. Which action is required?

Show answer and source: 29 CFR 1910.95(m)(5)

Answer: A. Transfer all of the records to the successor employer, who must retain them for the remainder of the retention periods that apply to each record type

OSHA's noise standard, 29 CFR 1910.95(m)(5), requires an employer that ceases business to transfer all required records to the successor employer. The successor keeps them for the rest of each (m)(3) period: two years for noise measurements, employment duration for audiometric records. Restarting the clock, discarding 14-month-old noise records, or giving records to employees and ending retention conflict with that rule.

On the job

A woodworking shop is sold, and the departing EHS manager is boxing up files for the incoming owner. The files include audiograms for a sawyer who will stay on and a noise survey from last year. The safety coordinator reminds her that a business ceasing operations must transfer all required noise records to the successor, who keeps each type for the rest of its retention period rather than starting a new clock.

Study aid, not site-specific safety advice. The official rule controls.

Answer A comes from

29 CFR 1910.95(m)(5)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)
“If the employer ceases to do business, the employer shall transfer to the successor employer all records required to be maintained by this section, and the successor employer shall retain them for the remainder of the period prescribed in paragraph (m)(3) of this section.”

Domain 7: Training

Question 13

A dialysis clinic completed annual bloodborne pathogens training for all staff four months ago. The clinic now introduces a new procedure for handling and disposing of contaminated sharps, which changes how technicians are exposed to blood during setup and teardown. What does the standard require the employer to do for the technicians?

Show answer and source: 29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(v)

Answer: A. Provide additional training on the new exposures created by the procedure; it may be limited to that new content

OSHA's bloodborne pathogens standard, 29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(v), requires additional training when new or modified tasks or procedures affect employees' occupational exposure. That training may cover only the new exposures. Waiting for the annual refresher or for an exposure incident ignores this trigger. Repeating the full initial program is not required.

On the job

A safety coordinator at an outpatient surgery center learns that the staff will begin using a different method to collect and discard used scalpel blades, changing how technicians handle contaminated sharps. All nurses and technicians completed annual bloodborne pathogens training recently. She schedules a short session limited to the exposures the new method creates, since the standard requires additional training when a new procedure affects occupational exposure.

Study aid, not site-specific safety advice. The official rule controls.

Answer A comes from

29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(v)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)
“Employers shall provide additional training when changes such as modification of tasks or procedures or institution of new tasks or procedures affect the employee's occupational exposure. The additional training may be limited to addressing the new exposures created.”

Domain 7: Training

Question 14

A remediation contractor hires an experienced technician who completed full HAZWOPER initial training and several years of supervised field work at hazardous waste sites with a previous employer. The technician has a certificate and documentation of that training and experience. The contractor is assigning the technician to a cleanup site where the technician has never worked. Which approach is consistent with the standard?

Show answer and source: 29 CFR 1910.120(e)(9)

Answer: B. Accept the documented equivalent training, but require site-specific training before entry and supervised field experience

OSHA's HAZWOPER standard, 29 CFR 1910.120(e)(9), lets an employer accept documented equivalent training in place of initial training. Employees new to a site still need site-specific training before entry and supervised field experience there. Repeating the full course is unnecessary. Immediate unsupervised entry and delaying site training a month both break the before-entry rule, and annual refresher training does not replace it.

On the job

A site superintendent at an industrial landfill remediation reviews a newly hired equipment operator's file, which holds documented equivalent HAZWOPER training from earlier jobs. Under 29 CFR 1910.120(e)(9), that documentation excuses the initial course, but an employee new to a site must still receive appropriate site-specific training before entry and supervised field experience there. The superintendent books the site orientation first and assigns a lead operator to supervise the newcomer's initial shifts.

Study aid, not site-specific safety advice. The official rule controls.

Answer B comes from

29 CFR 1910.120(e)(9)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)
“However, certified employees or employees with equivalent training new to a site shall receive appropriate, site specific training before site entry and have appropriate supervised field experience at the new site.”

Take the free CSP diagnostic next

The free 25-question diagnostic scores every CSP domain, no card needed. The pass opens all 1,383 questions, timed full-length mocks and the tutor.

Keep going in your CSP course

Your CSP pass opens every question, the lessons, domain quizzes and full-length mocks.

CSP practice test questions people ask

What is on the CSP exam?

The Certified Safety Professional (CSP) exam is a computer-based, multiple-choice exam run by the Board of Certified Safety Professionals (BCSP). BCSP allows 5.5 hours for it. The topics and their weights come from BCSP's CSP11 Examination Blueprint, V.2024.04.24: Advanced Application of Safety Principles (25%), Program Management (25%), Risk Management (15%), Emergency Management (9%), Environmental Management (6%), Occupational Health and Applied Science (10%), Training (10%).

Is there an official free CSP practice test?

BCSP publishes the CSP blueprint and its reference list for free on bcsp.org. Its own prep course, examCORE, is paid. The questions on this page are written by PassCited, not BCSP, and are not real exam questions.

How many questions are on the CSP exam?

BCSP's current exam pages give the time limit (5.5 hours) rather than a question count. BCSP's Complete Guide to Safety Certification (2022) states 200 multiple-choice items, and some items are unscored pretest items.

Where can I get more CSP practice questions?

Every CSP topic page on PassCited has free questions with cited answers, and the free 25-question diagnostic scores you by domain. The full CSP pass ($80, 6 months, one payment) opens all 1,383 checked questions and timed full-length mocks.

More free CSP practice