Emergency Action and Fire Prevention Plans practice questions for the ASP exam

ASP11 Domain 5: Emergency Preparedness and Response (5.1 Elements of an emergency response plan). 3 free questions below. Every answer quotes and links the regulation paragraph it rests on.

Regulations covered

Text pulled from the eCFR, current as of 2026-10-14.

Question 1

A chemical blending facility is required by another OSHA standard to have an emergency action plan. It has 14 employees on its roster, but only 9 are on site on any one shift. The owner proposes to skip a written plan and instead walk each new hire through the evacuation procedures verbally. Based on the emergency action plan standard, what is the correct response?

Show answer and source

Answer: C. Not acceptable, because the facility has more than 10 employees, so the plan must be in writing, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review

The oral-plan allowance applies to an employer with 10 or fewer employees, and this employer has 14, so the plan must be written, kept in the workplace, and available for review. The distractor claiming a written plan is always required is wrong because the standard permits oral communication for small employers.

“An emergency action plan must be in writing, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review. However, an employer with 10 or fewer employees may communicate the plan orally to employees.”
Question 2

A chemical blending facility evacuates all employees to an assembly area during a drill. Two operators who shut down a reactor line before leaving are told to follow the plan's shutdown steps. The plan identifies the reporting procedure, evacuation type and exit assignments, the shutdown steps for those operators, rescue and medical duty procedures, and a job title for questions. During the drill, the supervisor cannot tell whether the two operators and a visiting contractor have reached safety because no one is responsible for checking who is present at the assembly area. Which action best corrects the deficiency in the plan?

Show answer and source

Answer: A. Add procedures to account for all employees after evacuation

The scenario shows no method of checking who is present after evacuation, and the standard requires an emergency action plan to include procedures to account for all employees after evacuation. The other items are separate requirements, and the scenario says the contact job title is already in the plan, so adding it would not fix the gap.

“(4) Procedures to account for all employees after evacuation;”
Question 3

A safety coordinator is auditing a 60-employee plant's written fire prevention plan. For the employees responsible for maintaining equipment that prevents or controls ignition sources, the plan identifies only the job title "Maintenance Mechanic, Day Shift" and gives no individual names. Management says individuals change often and wants to leave the plan as written. Regarding this element of the plan, what is the correct finding?

Show answer and source

Answer: A. Compliant, because the plan may identify those responsible by job title instead of by name

The standard requires the name or job title of the employees responsible for maintaining equipment to prevent or control ignition sources, so a job title satisfies this element. Requiring names, or both names and titles, adds something the standard does not ask for.

“The name or job title of employees responsible for maintaining equipment to prevent or control sources of ignition or fires; and”
4 more emergency action and fire prevention plans questions in the full bank

Unlock every ASP question with timed practice, the AI tutor and full-length mocks. Or start with the free diagnostic.

Original practice questions, not real exam items. PassCited is not affiliated with or endorsed by BCSP.