Emergency Action Plans questions for the CHST
CHST5 Domain 2: Emergency Preparedness, Incident Investigation, and Response (K2.2 Emergency action plans; S2.2 Prepare a site EAP). 2 free questions below. Every answer quotes and links the regulation paragraph it rests on.
Regulations covered
- 29 CFR 1910.38 Emergency action plans.How this section is tested
- 29 CFR 1926.35 Employee emergency action plans.How this section is tested
Text pulled from the eCFR, current as of 2026-10-14.
Question 1
A technician audits a jobsite's emergency action plan. The site has one employee alarm system. When the on-site fire brigade is called out, a supervisor sounds a continuous horn blast. When all employees must evacuate, the supervisor sounds the same continuous horn blast. Training records show every worker was told that the horn means 'report to the muster point.' Which finding is correct?
Show answer and source
Answer: C. Noncompliant, because a distinctive signal must be used for each purpose the alarm system serves
The same alarm system serves two purposes (alerting fire brigade members and evacuation), so the standard requires a distinctive signal for each. Training workers on one shared signal does not satisfy this, and the standard calls for distinct signals, not separate systems.
Answer C rests on
29 CFR 1926.35(c)(2)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)“If the employee alarm system is used for alerting fire brigade members, or for other purposes, a distinctive signal for each purpose shall be used.”
Question 2
A contractor's draft emergency action plan for a building renovation assigns escape routes by floor, names the employees trained for rescue and medical duties, tells workers to report fires by calling the site emergency number, and lists the safety manager's job title for questions about the plan. During a drill, no one could say whether a two-person drywall crew had made it out. Which minimum plan element is missing and should be added to fix this gap?
Show answer and source
Answer: B. Procedures to account for all employees after emergency evacuation has been completed
The draft already covers escape routes, rescue and medical duties, reporting means, and a contact person. The drill failure shows it lacks procedures to account for all employees after evacuation. Re-entry to search is not a listed element, and the standard does not require extinguisher maps or insurer lists in the plan.
Answer B rests on
29 CFR 1926.35(b)(3)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)“(3) Procedures to account for all employees after emergency evacuation has been completed;”
18 more emergency action plans questions in the full CHST bank
Related topics
Original practice questions, not real exam items. PassCited is not affiliated with or endorsed by BCSP.