29 CFR 1910.147: The control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout)
The official text is on the eCFR. This page maps how the section is organized, quotes the paragraphs our ASP, CSP practice questions are built on, and gives free questions you can try. Text below is quoted from the eCFR, current as of 2026-10-14; the section was last amended 2017-01-01.
How 29 CFR 1910.147 is organized
- (a) Scope, application, and purpose—(1) Scope17 paragraphs
- (b)15 paragraphs
- (c) General—(1) Energy control program47 paragraphs
- (d) Application of control12 paragraphs
- (e) Release from lockout or tagout8 paragraphs
- (f)16 paragraphs
- [Appendix A to § 1910.147]35 paragraphs
Paragraphs our practice questions cite most
Counted across the 24 live PassCited questions built on this section. This reflects our question bank, not the real exam.
“(ii) If an energy isolating device is capable of being locked out, the employer's energy control program under paragraph (c)(1) of this section shall utilize lockout, unless the employer can demonstrate that the utilization of a tagout system will provide full employee protection as set forth in paragraph (c)(3) of this section.”
“(3) Full employee protection. (i) When a tagout device is used on an energy isolating device which is capable of being locked out, the tagout device shall be attached at the same location that the lockout device would have been attached, and the employer shall demonstrate that the tagout program will provide a level of safety equivalent to that obtained by using a lockout program.”
“(3) Tags shall not deteriorate when used in corrosive environments such as areas where acid and alkali chemicals are handled and stored.”
“(A) Retraining shall be provided for all authorized and affected employees whenever there is a change in their job assignments, a change in machines, equipment or processes that present a new hazard, or when there is a change in the energy control procedures.”
“(B) Additional retraining shall also be conducted whenever a periodic inspection under paragraph (c)(6) of this section reveals, or whenever the employer has reason to believe, that there are deviations from or inadequacies in the employee's knowledge or use of the energy control procedures.”
Free practice questions on 29 CFR 1910.147
Question 1
A maintenance crew is assigned to clear a jam from a conveyor. The main disconnect on the conveyor is a type that has a hasp and can accept a padlock. The supervisor proposes using only a tag on the disconnect because it is faster. Under the standard, what must the employer's energy control program do?
Show answer and source
Answer: A. Utilize lockout, unless the employer can demonstrate that a tagout system will provide full employee protection
When an energy isolating device can be locked out, the program must use lockout unless the employer can demonstrate that tagout provides full employee protection. Supervisor approval or short duration does not satisfy that requirement.
Answer A rests on
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(2)(ii)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)“If an energy isolating device is capable of being locked out, the employer's energy control program under paragraph (c)(1) of this section shall utilize lockout, unless the employer can demonstrate that the utilization of a tagout system will provide full employee protection as set forth in paragraph (c)(3) of this section.”
Question 2
During a periodic inspection of a conveyor line's lockout/tagout procedure, the inspector observes that a maintenance mechanic skipped a required step when isolating the equipment. The employee's training records are current and were completed six months ago. What does the standard require the employer to do?
Show answer and source
Answer: A. Conduct additional retraining, because the inspection revealed deviations in the employee's use of the energy control procedures
The standard requires additional retraining whenever a periodic inspection reveals deviations from or inadequacies in an employee's use of the energy control procedures, regardless of how recent the earlier training was. Current certification does not excuse the deviation, and lockout/tagout may be performed only by authorized employees, so reassigning it to an affected employee is not an option.
Answer A rests on
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(iii)(B)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)“Additional retraining shall also be conducted whenever a periodic inspection under paragraph (c)(6) of this section reveals, or whenever the employer has reason to believe, that there are deviations from or inadequacies in the employee's knowledge or use of the energy control procedures.”
Question 3
A plant's packaging line is modified so that a new pneumatic press is added to the line, creating a compressed-air hazard that the existing lockout procedure does not address. The plant's maintenance technicians (authorized employees) and the line operators (affected employees) were all trained on the old procedure last year, and the training records are current. The safety manager revises the energy control procedure to cover the new press. What must the employer do regarding training?
Show answer and source
Answer: C. Retrain both the authorized and the affected employees, because a change in equipment that presents a new hazard and a change in the energy control procedure each trigger retraining
The standard requires retraining for all authorized and affected employees whenever machines or equipment change in a way that presents a new hazard, or when the energy control procedures change. Limiting retraining to technicians is wrong because the requirement covers affected employees too, and waiting for an inspection is wrong because the change itself triggers retraining.
Answer C rests on
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(iii)(A)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)“Retraining shall be provided for all authorized and affected employees whenever there is a change in their job assignments, a change in machines, equipment or processes that present a new hazard, or when there is a change in the energy control procedures.”
Question 4
During an audit of a chemical plant's lockout/tagout program, a safety professional finds that the facility's tagout devices are uniform in print and format, identify the employee who applied them, and are attached with non-reusable, self-locking nylon straps. In the acid and alkali storage room, however, the paper-based tags have been seen curling, with the ink bleeding until the handwriting is unreadable after only a few weeks of exposure to chemical vapors and splashes. Which conclusion is consistent with the standard?
Show answer and source
Answer: B. The tags are noncompliant because tags must not deteriorate in corrosive environments such as areas where acid and alkali chemicals are handled and stored.
The standard requires tags not to deteriorate in corrosive environments such as acid and alkali areas, and these tags are failing that test even though they meet the standardization, identification, and attachment criteria. Meeting other criteria does not offset the durability failure, and the standard does not set a fixed replacement schedule.
Answer B rests on
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii)(A)(3)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)“(3) Tags shall not deteriorate when used in corrosive environments such as areas where acid and alkali chemicals are handled and stored.”
Question 5
A plant has hired an outside millwright contractor to rebuild a hydraulic press, which is servicing covered by the lockout/tagout standard. On the morning of the job, the contractor's supervisor hands the plant's maintenance supervisor a copy of the contractor's written lockout procedure and says, "We use our own locks and will follow this." The plant supervisor files it without comment and gives the contractor the press location. Which required step has NOT yet been met?
Show answer and source
Answer: B. The plant has not informed the contractor of the plant's own lockout or tagout procedures, so the two employers have not informed each other of their respective procedures
The standard requires the on-site employer and the outside employer to inform each other of their respective procedures, so a one-way handoff leaves the plant's obligation to share its own procedure unmet. The other options describe replacing locks, adopting the contractor's procedure, or contractor-led training of plant staff, none of which the standard requires.
Answer B rests on
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(2)(i)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)“Whenever outside servicing personnel are to be engaged in activities covered by the scope and application of this standard, the on-site employer and the outside employer shall inform each other of their respective lockout or tagout procedures.”
Where it shows up in exam prep
Find out which regulations you'd miss
Other Part 1910 sections
- 29 CFR 1910.1020: Access to employee exposure and medical records
- 29 CFR 1910.1030: Bloodborne pathogens
- 29 CFR 1910.1053: Respirable crystalline silica
- 29 CFR 1910.106: Flammable liquids
- 29 CFR 1910.119: Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals
- 29 CFR 1910.120: Hazardous waste operations and emergency response
This is a study aid, not legal advice or an official interpretation. Always check the current eCFR text. Original practice questions, not real exam items. PassCited is not affiliated with or endorsed by BCSP.