Skip to content

Risk Financing, Insurance and Experience Rating questions for the CSP

CSP Domain 3: Risk Management (3.3 Financial risk mitigation strategies (risk retention, risk transfer, loss prevention and reduction)). 6 free questions below. Every answer quotes and links the source document it comes from.

Sources covered

Guidance documents are quoted from the published edition linked above; they are recommendations, not regulations.

Question 1

Two similar-sized employers in the same classification each had $50,000 in total workers' compensation losses during the experience period. Employer A had one $50,000 claim. Employer B had ten claims of about $5,000 each. A risk manager must say which employer should expect higher workers' compensation costs in the future under NCCI's reasoning. Which answer fits?

Show answer and source: NCCI, ABCs of Experience Rating, PDF p. 3

Answer: D. Employer B, because its higher number of losses generally signals higher future costs

NCCI's experience rating guidance says that for two similar employers, the one with more losses will generally have higher future costs. Employer A is not the higher risk, because one large loss does not imply a pattern. Equal totals do not mean equal futures. Claim cost is less predictable than whether an accident occurred.

Answer D comes from

NCCI, ABCs of Experience Rating, PDF p. 3(opens ncci.com in a new tab)
“In other words, for two similar employers, the one with the higher frequency of losses will generally have higher future workers compensation costs.”

Question 2

A state's per-claim accident limitation is $200,000. An employer has one workers' compensation claim that totals $500,000. A safety director is asked how much of this claim is used to calculate the employer's experience mod. What should the director report?

Show answer and source: NCCI, ABCs of Experience Rating, PDF p. 3

Answer: A. $200,000 as ratable loss, with the remaining $300,000 excluded as non-ratable

NCCI's experience rating guidance says the state accident limitation caps each individual loss. A $500,000 loss is capped at $200,000 for rating, and the amount above the cap is non-ratable and excluded from the mod. The full amount is not used, the excess is not the ratable part, and the claim is not dropped entirely.

On the job

A safety director at a construction firm reviews the experience mod worksheet after a severe fall claim. The state's per-claim accident limitation caps each individual loss, so only the capped portion counts as ratable loss in the rating. The amount above the cap is non-ratable and excluded from the mod. The director tells management the full claim total will not drive the mod.

Study aid, not site-specific safety advice. The official rule controls.

Answer A comes from

NCCI, ABCs of Experience Rating, PDF p. 3(opens ncci.com in a new tab)
“Exhibit A shows that an individual loss of $500,000 would be capped at $200,000 for experience rating purposes. These limited losses that the Plan uses are ratable losses.”

Question 3

A state requires $14,000 in audited premium subject to experience rating in the most recent two years of the experience period, or an average of $7,000 over the overall experience period. An employer for the 2026 mod had audited subject premium of $6,000 for 2024, $6,800 for 2023, and $8,500 for 2022. What is the correct conclusion?

Show answer and source: NCCI, ABCs of Experience Rating, PDF p. 7

Answer: B. It qualifies through the three-year average of about $7,100, so experience rating is mandatory

NCCI's guide gives two ways to qualify: enough premium in the most recent two years, or the threshold on average over the whole period. The two-year total of $12,800 misses $14,000, but the three-year average of about $7,100 meets $7,000. Because the employer qualifies, rating is mandatory, not optional.

On the job

A risk manager at a small machine shop checks whether the state will experience rate the company's workers' compensation policy. The last two years of audited premium fall short of the two-year threshold, so the manager runs the second test, comparing average premium over the full experience period to the average threshold. Meeting that average threshold means the employer qualifies, and rating is mandatory rather than optional.

Study aid, not site-specific safety advice. The official rule controls.

Answer B comes from

NCCI, ABCs of Experience Rating, PDF p. 7(opens ncci.com in a new tab)
“Example A state requires $14,000 in audited premium subject to experience rating in the most recent two years of the experience period OR an average of $7,000 in the overall experience period.”

Question 4

A fabrication company's mod worksheet shows adjusted actual losses of $258,000 and adjusted expected losses of $300,000. The mod is adjusted actual losses divided by adjusted expected losses. The company's manual premium at renewal is $150,000. What premium results after the mod is applied to the manual premium?

Show answer and source: NCCI, ABCs of Experience Rating, PDF p. 14

Answer: D. $129,000

NCCI's experience rating guide says the mod is adjusted actual losses divided by adjusted expected losses, and it is applied to the manual premium at renewal. Here $258,000 ÷ $300,000 = 0.86, and 0.86 × $150,000 = $129,000. Leaving the premium unchanged ignores the mod. Dividing by the mod inverts it. Subtracting the loss difference mixes up losses and premium.

On the job

A risk manager at a machine shop reviews the renewal worksheet from the rating bureau. Adjusted actual losses are $180,000 against adjusted expected losses of $200,000, so dividing the first by the second gives a mod of 0.90. The manager applies that mod to the $100,000 manual premium at renewal to project the premium the company will actually pay.

Study aid, not site-specific safety advice. The official rule controls.

Answer D comes from

NCCI, ABCs of Experience Rating, PDF p. 14(opens ncci.com in a new tab)
“The mod (34) is derived by dividing adjusted actual losses by the adjusted expected losses, or $243,120 ÷ $242,971 = 1.00. This 1.00 is applied to the employer’s manual premium at the policy’s renewal, effective January 1, 2026.”

Question 5

A state has approved the Experience Rating Adjustment (ERA). A manufacturer has one medical-only workers' compensation claim of $40,000 in its experience period. The split point puts $18,500 in the primary portion and $21,500 in the excess portion. A safety director wants to know how much of this claim will count in the mod calculation. What total amount will be included?

Show answer and source: NCCI, ABCs of Experience Rating, PDF p. 5

Answer: C. $12,000, which is 30% of the primary and excess portions combined

NCCI's experience rating guide says the mod includes only 30% of the primary and excess portions of a medical-only claim. Thirty percent of $40,000 is $12,000. Counting only the primary portion, cutting only the primary portion, or counting the full claim all ignore the 30% rule applied to both portions.

On the job

A risk manager at a trucking company reviews its experience rating worksheet in a state that has approved the Experience Rating Adjustment. One medical-only claim of $10,000 appears in the experience period, and the manager wants to know its weight in the mod. Under NCCI's guide, only 30% of the primary and excess portions of a medical-only claim is included, so the manager enters $3,000, not the full paid amount, when projecting next year's premium.

Study aid, not site-specific safety advice. The official rule controls.

Answer C comes from

NCCI, ABCs of Experience Rating, PDF p. 5(opens ncci.com in a new tab)
“The mod calculation includes only 30% of the actual primary and excess portions of an individual medical-only claim.”

Question 6

Two similar employers in the same state and classification are both subject to experience rating. Employer A has a rating effective date of April 1. Employer B has a rating effective date of October 1. A risk manager at Employer B assumes both companies' mods use exactly the same policy years because of the shared state and class. Which statement is correct?

Show answer and source: NCCI, ABCs of Experience Rating, PDF p. 5

Answer: A. The experience periods can differ because each employer's rating effective date sets its own experience period

NCCI's guide says each employer is evaluated on its own experience period, and the rating effective date determines that period. Employers with different rating effective dates can therefore use different policy years. A single statewide period, a period tied to the largest claim, and a medical-only trigger are not in the rule.

On the job

A risk manager at a masonry contractor compares notes with a peer at a landscaping firm in the same state. Both are experience rated, but the peer's mod worksheet uses different policy years than hers. She checks the rating effective date on each worksheet. Because that date determines each employer's experience period, two employers can be evaluated on different policy years, so she reviews only the periods shown on her own company's worksheet.

Study aid, not site-specific safety advice. The official rule controls.

Answer A comes from

NCCI, ABCs of Experience Rating, PDF p. 5(opens ncci.com in a new tab)
“Because the mod is based on past payroll and loss experience, each employer is evaluated based on its own experience period. An employer’s rating effective date determines the experience period.”

19 more questions on this topic

The free 25-question diagnostic scores every CSP domain. The pass opens every question, timed practice, the AI tutor and full-length mocks.

Practice this in your course

All 25 questions on this topic, plus a quick check.

Related topics

More CSP study material