Excavation and Working Over Water questions for the CSP
CSP11 Domain 1: Advanced Application of Safety Principles (1.3 Excavation; working around water). 3 free questions below. Every answer quotes and links the regulation paragraph it rests on.
Regulations covered
- 29 CFR 1926.106 Working over or near water.
- 29 CFR 1926.651 Specific excavation requirements.How this section is tested
Text pulled from the eCFR, current as of 2026-10-14.
Question 1
A crew is excavating a utility trench for a new water service. The excavation is expected to cross the area where a buried gas line may run. The competent person called the gas utility, but the utility says it cannot send a locator for 3 days, and no state or local law requires a longer response period. What may the employer do?
Show answer and source
Answer: B. Proceed with caution, provided detection equipment or other acceptable means are used to locate the utility installations
When the utility cannot respond within 24 hours (absent a longer period required by state or local law), the employer may proceed, but only with caution and with detection equipment or other acceptable means to locate the installations. Proceeding with normal methods and no detection ignores that condition, and the standard does not require a complete work stoppage.
Answer B rests on
29 CFR 1926.651(b)(2)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)“When utility companies or owners cannot respond to a request to locate underground utility installations within 24 hours (unless a longer period is required by state or local law), or cannot establish the exact location of these installations, the employer may proceed, provided the employer does so with caution, and provided detection equipment or other acceptable means to locate utility installations are used.”
Question 2
A crew is installing a storm sewer in a trench. Overnight rain left water accumulating, and the foreman has a sump pump running to hold the water level down so the crew can re-enter. The foreman says the pump will "take care of itself" and assigns no one to watch it. Midmorning, the pump's discharge hose kinks and the pump stops without anyone noticing while four workers are in the trench. Which statement best identifies what the standard required that would have addressed this situation?
Show answer and source
Answer: D. A competent person had to monitor the water removal equipment and its operation to ensure it was working properly, since the pump was the control keeping water from accumulating.
Because water removal equipment was being used to control accumulation, the standard requires a competent person to monitor both the equipment and its operation to ensure proper operation. Merely installing the pump and walking away does not meet this duty, and the standard lists water removal as an acceptable precaution rather than limiting precautions to a harness and lifeline.
Answer D rests on
29 CFR 1926.651(h)(2)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)“If water is controlled or prevented from accumulating by the use of water removal equipment, the water removal equipment and operations shall be monitored by a competent person to ensure proper operation.”
Question 3
After a thunderstorm overnight, a crew returns to a 7-foot-deep utility trench. Before anyone enters, the competent person walks the trench and finds fresh cracking along the top of one wall and water seeping from the face. The foreman says the trench was inspected yesterday morning and the crew is behind schedule, so two laborers should begin setting pipe while the competent person goes to inspect another site. What does the standard require in this situation?
Show answer and source
Answer: D. Employees must be kept out of the hazardous area until the necessary precautions have been taken to ensure their safety
The competent person found evidence of a possible cave-in after a rainstorm, so exposed employees must be removed from the hazardous area until precautions have been taken. Yesterday's inspection does not satisfy the requirement, because inspections are also required after every rainstorm or other hazard-increasing occurrence.
Answer D rests on
29 CFR 1926.651(k)(2)(opens ecfr.gov in a new tab)“Where the competent person finds evidence of a situation that could result in a possible cave-in, indications of failure of protective systems, hazardous atmospheres, or other hazardous conditions, exposed employees shall be removed from the hazardous area until the necessary precautions have been taken to ensure their safety.”
6 more excavation and working over water questions in the full CSP bank
Related topics
Original practice questions, not real exam items. PassCited is not affiliated with or endorsed by BCSP.